Calandra -4th amendment (search and seizure) -5th amendment (not to incriminate yourself) Facts: -steak out for suspected drug dealing -information from confidential informant -previous convicted drug dealer -search warrantee disposed(p) by drug enforcement officer (experienced) -warrant issued by state stress -drugs institute and indicted in Federal Court for drug dealing Rule: -federal judge overturned warrant -reliability was not established -probable cause of drug sale was not independently established -the exclusionary rule -constitutional rule Reasoning: - good faith exception -person who was profaned has ground to prevent government from using obtained recite The prior bill in the oddball U.S. v. Leon is the case Mapp v. Ohio, the case U.S. v. Calandra, the 4th amendment, and the 5the amendment. In the case Mapp v. Ohio, the police did and illegal search by rupture into the home without a search warrant. The search warrant was never produced at trial and Mapp was convicted of possession of obscene books that were not hers. The courts allowed the evidence knowing that hey unlawfully seized. In the case of U.S. v. Calandra, was a case about limiting the exclusionary rule. The facts in the case of U.S. v. Leon, the police had a confidential informant of unproven reliability and got a warrant based on his information. The police did a steak out and discovered Leons car at his house. Leon was already a convicted drug dealer and the warrant was prepared by a drug enforcement semiofficial and issued by a state judge. The rules in the case... If you want to wreak a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment