Running Head : AYER AND WITTGENSTEINAyer and WittgensteinAssessing A . J . Ayer s Criticisms of Wittgenstein s Rejection of the Private wrangle ArgumentByMACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Names of Author (s )]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Course Identification information here]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Professors seduce here]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Submission date here]Ayer and Wittgenstein : Assessing A . J . Ayer s Criticismsof Wittgenstein s Rejection of the Private spoken actors line ArgumentIn an expression written by A . J . Ayer , he contends that Ludwig Wittgenstein s claim in the Philosophical Investigations that there gutternot be a nonpublic language is mistaken . At the onset of the article Ayer wrote : In a quite ordinary sense , it is perspicuous that there can be one-on-one languages . There can be , because there are (1985 ,.
453This philosophical s task is to wait on the question : Does Ayer misunderstand the idea of a private language Clearly the way by which this question may be properly and adequately answered is by considering (1 ) What Wittgenstein meant by a private language and what his arguments are so as to see why he rejects the possibility of a private language and (2 ) What Ayer meant by a private language and what his arguments are so as to see why he contends that the idea of a private language is not only possible but also that there are , indeed , languages that may be called privateThe philosophical problem of a private language , as Wittgenstein sees it , save like most philosophical problems , stems...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment