12 Angry Men

12 wroth MenGrand Canyon University Introduction: In the word-painting 12 Angry Men an eighteen year former(a) boy is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the 12 jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a probable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or non. The man who does not believe that the boy is guilty explains his views to the rest of the jurors and is ridiculed by them. An elder man afterward sees where he is going with his reasoning and when the following(a) vote is done, he also votes innocent. The jurors continue to discuss the carapace and bring up some important facts in party favour of the teenager. Gradually, other jurors sire to change their minds, and the ones that do not fashion outraged. This paper germinate out analyze this movie in terms of how this group worked in concert and the end do process, which emerged by answering nine pick out questions. What is the make up ones mind of relevant background factors on each jurors decision making process?

juror 1 was a coach and knew the align meaning of working together and in an orderly fashion. jurywoman 2 was a flocculent spoken follower who could be swayed by the crowd. juror 3 stood his ground with the guilty verdict until the end because of the tear relationship with his own son. The fact that Juror 4 wore eyeglasses made him reconsider the womans testimony of discern the boy stab his father as she was turning everyplace in bed. He knew people who wear eyeglasses do not wear them to bed. Juror 5 was min! or mannered and kept his cool and was receptive to the others thoughts and opinions and lessons they taught him. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper