Introduction to Conflict Resolution Essay

divergence is adept of the drivers for improved team doing. Managed closely, participation can lead to better decisions, more than(prenominal) creative ideas and higher quality take from the team. Managed sorryly, it can stop teamwork and hinder individuals from achieving their face-to-face goals. (Conflict Resolution For Team Members (n. d. ) taken from TeamTechnology. co. uk http//www. teamtechnology. com. uk/ deviationresolution. html) The designation presents a situation in which a divergence occurred and what happened. Also, the engagement discusses on what should pick up been done and which was the wronged party.The conflict presented is between the both meetings of the recruits that are undergoing training in the VP-92 dark blue P-3 squadron. The recruits were divided into cardinal free radicals for a mock intention attack mission one was liable for identification of the identifys and informing the otherwise group ab go forth the location of the stubs and the bite group was mantic to inscribe the targets. The worry arose when the area surrounding the vessel was bleary-eyed and the targets could non be place clearly by the starting signal group. Hence, the uphold group, whose performance was dependent on the low group, could not subscribe and shoot the targets.This was followed by an ancestry and a conflict between the two groups which was resolved by the officers. Then the writer says which side he would engender elect and why and what actions he would stir taken. The conflict, even small it was, was genuine and both the parties were warrant and neither one is to be pluckd. name Introduction to Conflict Resolution relegate I The Organization The organisation that is to be discussed below is VP-92. It is dark blue P-3 Squadron where the navy conducts its trading operations. The navy as well(p) provides training to its new recruits.A Navy is the branch of a arenas military forces principally designated fo r ocean warfare, namely lake- or ocean-borne combat operations and related functions. It includes operations conducted by come to the fore vessels (ships), submarine vessels, and seaborne aviation, as well as ancillary support, communications, training, and other field recent developments have included space-related operations. (en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Navy) spark II The Conflict The conflict at VP-92 was between two groups of the marine gang at an assignment of mock target attack mission.One group, consisting of five crew-members, was responsible for identifying targets to be hit, while the other group, also consisting of five crew men, was responsible for smasher the targets in the assigned target areas to them. The conflict arose when the group that was supposed to identify targets could not identify the targets to be hit on time out-of-pocket(p) to the fog and spread over that was blurring their visibility and making it hard for them to locate their targets. As the tar gets could not be identified on time, the group that was supposed to strike the targets could not perform their duties on time.As a result a conflict arose between the two groups. Basically the batsmans work dep finish on the identifiers and the second group could not perform well because identifiers had a problem with identifying the targets. The strikers could not justly strike their targets and their aim was wrong and not rightly focused. Hence, they put all the blame of their bad performance on the first group. Part III Choose a Side I choose to be on the side of the group that could not properly identify their targets due to the bad weather and the mist that was blurring their view and became a hindrance to performing well.How Was it Managed? The group that was supposed to identify the targets in the mock target attack mission, informed the other group about the weather situation. However, when they persisted that targets should be identified, the assignment was not called of f. The identifiers were asked to continue with their look for, which they did but pass a lot of time due to the lack of clarity of vision causes by fog. However, when the strikers could not rightly strike their targets, they fiendish the identifiers for wrongly identifying their targets and also spending a lot of time on searching for targets.I reckon the conflict was really much genuine and there were no own(prenominal) reasons for this conflict. The conflict was substantive because the group that was supposed to locate the targets to be afflicted could not be identified due to external factors such as the weather. other reason may also have been the location of the ship where the fog was more and the targets were not visible. There was no ostracize impact on the goal development of the organisation or even the personal/ working relationships between the two groups.Since this was a mock assignment thats aim was to train the new recruits in the navy to properly identify a nd aim their targets. In my view, the weather condition provided a odour of the real target attack missions confront by the navy. The goal of this assignment would have been achieved if both the groups became experts in their tasks in versatile whether conditions. However, expertise comes with practice and experience. Hence, I think this assignment and conflict was the first bill towards attaining the goal.Even though this conflict arose out of a blame game for the two groups, one blaming the weather and the other blaming the first group, the argument was purely professional and not personal. There was a heated bowl over between the two groups, but this ended when the officers arrived after few minutes to get together their remarks. After both the groups had presented their points of view to the officers, they were told that it was a part of the navy life and the navy assignments and no particular group was to be blamed for the failure to aim the target properly. Hence, this ar gument did not produce whatever hard feelings between the groups.