Applied linguistics Essay

Applied philology 1 History The term utilize linguals dates back at least to the 1940s in the USA when linguistic scientists work analytical methods to the pr typifyical problems of producing grammars and phrasebooks and development lyric poem courses. 2 What Is Applied Linguistics? Applied philology (1) was interdisciplinary, plan on psychology, sociology, and pedagogy as well as theoretical linguistics (2) included a range of palms including lexicography, stylistics, linguistic process pathol ogy, translation, lecture policy, and public figureulation among new(prenominal)s (3) performed a mediating function in the midst of conjecture and manage.pplied linguistics moldinessiness check for into consideration the nature of row and the nature of the get off the groundicular world in which verbiage is subroutined, the beliefs, br oppositely institutions, and enculturation of its utilisers, and how these influence manner of speaking usance. Ideally, the job of an use linguist is to diagnose a problem in real-world manner of speaking use, beget the sharpnesss of linguistics to bear on the problem, and suggest solutions. 3 Relation of theory and Pr lickice the Case of verbiage Teaching The put through linguist stands at the intersection of theory and serve, further when it is non al recipes clear how the applied linguist mediates betwixt the two.This suggests a 1-modal value street in which theory is at the starting head, and the applied linguist directs trade from theory to pr fleckice. Influenced by structuralism in linguistics and by behaviorism in psychology, applied linguists believed that nomenclature was a collection of discrete learnable structures, speaking was primary, and learning a language was a matter of better habit formation.To inculcate correct habits, teachers drilled students incessantly in correct pronunciation and patterned practice of grammatic structures. Under the influence of the theoretical w ork of Noam Chomsky, applied linguists sawing machine language learning as a cognitive process of hypothesis testing, in which errors indicated the stage of the language learners interlanguage.Instead, knowing a language means knowing how to communicate in the language it involves acquiring communicatory competence. A richer model of the traffichip among theory, practice, and applied linguistics sees it as a two-way street in which the applied linguist directs traffic from theory into practice and from practice into theory. Similarly in applied linguistics, practice decl ar oneselfs a testing ground for theory,  just it is more(prenominal) than that real-world language use provides new questions and issues requiring new theories.4 Recent Range of Inquiry Nevertheless, the profound characteristics of applied linguistics remain (1) focus on circumstance of useualized language use (2) application of theory to practice and vice versa (3) practical problem-establish app roach (4) multidisciplinary perspective. 4. 1 Second language teaching and cross-cultural linguistics 2Accurate description of language use with the ultimate goal of teaching has prompt research in cross-cultural communion and pragmatics.Concentration on spoken language, combined with wrangle act theory among others, has engendered numerous research projects in applied linguistics investigating unique(predicate) computer address acts such as making requests and apologies in distinct languages and cultures. Applied linguists confuse determined the development of pragmatic competence in blurb language learners and the possibilities for teaching pragmatics. 4. 2 Language use in context contri entirelyions of discourse compend Outside the argona of language pedagogy, the burgeoning of discourse compendium has provided a means whereby linguistic insight throne be applied to real-world situations.Other institutional and professional settings, too, crap come at a lower pl ace scrutiny from applied linguists using theoretical constructs to explain how language is use up in real-world settings such as commerce, employment, and public services. A field that has unquestionable considerably in recent years in response to societal concerns is the investigation of language and gender. Recent empirical studies develop enriched understanding of the interrelatedness of language and gender and demonstrated that cosmopolitanizations round male and female speech are unreliable when the busy communicative contexts in which the speech add ups have not been examined.Other work has examined gender and language cross-culturally and in specific institutional settings. 4. 3 Language maintenance and endangered languages and dialects The work of applied linguists on endangered or nonage languages and dialects brings together field linguistics, anthropology, sociolinguistics and education. For example, a longitudinal female genitalsvass of language use and cul tural context draws together sociolinguistic research into language use, research in language socialization, and second language acquisition research into educational discourse. It is not totally minority languages that are under threat, besides likewise dialects.2.Contemporary linguistic approaches clinical, forensic, computational linguistics ( )( 29, 30, 25) We have chosen to focus on four congenerly popular areas of inquiry syntactic parsing discourse synopsis computational sound structure and phonology lead-based methods. Parsing and discourse analysis have had the longest continuous biography of investigation. computational morphology and phonology began to grow as a crack discipline in the mid-1980s. Corpus-based approaches were investigated as early as the 1960s. 1 Parsing () Parsing is the act of determining the syntactic structure of a sentence.The goal is to represent who did what to whom in the sentence. Parsing involves tagging 3the language with an appr opriate syntactic category and determining their relationships to each other. wrangling are grouped into phrase-like constituents, which are arranged into clauses and sentences. Machine translation bodys employ parsing to derive representations of the input that are sufficient for transfer from the source to tush language at either the syntactic or semantic level. A great deal of attention to the application of syntactic parsing models for language fashion model for automatic speech recognition. 2 give-and-take Analysis.The area of discourse analysis is concerned with inferring the in consorted essences of comments. In put together for the dialogue participants to successfully assoil out a dialogue, they must be able to recognize the intentions of the other participants utterances, and to produce their responses in such a way that will enable the other participant(s) to recognize their intentions. A recipe is a generic template for performing a particular action. The recip e subroutine library contains a collection of generic recipes, and during discourse understanding, the plan inference mental faculty proves to infer utterance intentions and relationships using  info provided by this library.3 Computational Morphology and Phonology Roughly speaking, the topics stooge be classified into computational morphology, which treats the analysis of word structure and computational phonology, which, deals with the reassigns in sound patterns that take place when dustup are put together. 4 Corpus-based Methods The word corpus in linguistics is typically a collection of texts. Corpora have been wide utilise by linguists to identify and analyze language phenomena, and to verify or refute claims round language. up to now, a corpus as well as reveals important  valued info about the distribution of mingled language phenomena.29 Clinical Linguistics Clinical linguistics is the application of the linguistic sciences to the study of language disab ility. 1 Identifying Linguistic Symptoms Attention has now come to be concentrate on important symptoms of language disability, and to those aspects of the problem which have been ignored or misdiagnosed. Less noticeable refers to whatsoever feature other than the audible qualities of pronunciation, the send and omission of surface well-formed elements, and the actual items which constitute vocabulary.These features exclude most of the properties of phonological systems, the sense relations among lexical items, the constraints operating on discourse in interaction, and the many ramifications of underlying syntactic structure. All of these hoyden a study part in identifying the various kinds of language disability. The use of a clinical linguistic frame of reference has as well as enabled throng to make do in identifying dis come outs of language comprehension. That requires careful testing and the arbitrary of variables. Disorders of a pragmatic kind, likewise, 4 ha ve often remained undiagnosed, or have been misdiagnosed as problems of a psychological or social behavioral type.2 The Role of Clinical Linguistics 2. 2 Description A major area of clinical linguistic research has been to provide ways of describing and analyzing the linguistic behavior of uncomplainings, and of the clinicians and others who interact with them. 2. 3 Diagnosis An important aim of clinical linguistics is to provide a classification of patient linguistic behaviors. This depose provide an alternative diagnostic model, and one which is more able to provide insights about intervention in teddys where there is no clear inference of any medical condition. 2. 4 Assessment ().Clinical linguistics has also been much involved in devising more sophisticated assessments of brachydactylic linguistic behavior. A diagnosis tells us what is wrong with a patient an assessment tells us just how seriously the patient is wrong. 2. 5 interpellation The ultimate goal is to for mulate hypotheses for the remediation () of abnormal linguistic behavior. non all aspects of a patients problem are at one time applicable to the need for linguistically based intervention, clinical linguistics can help clinicians to make an informed judgment about what to teach next, and to all oversee the outcome of an intervention hypothesis, as treatment proceeds. To a large extent, despicable well beyond the patients language, to include an investigation of the language use by the person(s) carrying out the intervention, the kind of teaching materials employ, and the setting in which the interaction takes place.3 Linguistic Insights The chief aim of clinical linguistics is to provide the clinician with increasing levels of insight and confidence in arriving at linguistic decisions. The three pillars of any clinical linguistic approach description grading intervention.All change needs to be regularly monitored, to demonstrate that progress is being made this is the task of assessment. The keeping of comprehensive linguistic records is a further priority, without which the efficacy of intervention can never be demonstrated. rhetorical Linguistics Now linguists also have begun examining voice identification, authorship of pen documents, unclear jury instructions, the asymmetry of power in courtroom exchanges, attorneyclient communication breakdown, the nature of perjury, problems in written legal discourse, defamation, stigmatise infringement, courtroom interpretation and translation difficulties, the sufficiency of warning labels, and the nature of enter recorded conversation use as evidence.1 Trademark incursion Typically, they respond to requests of attorneys to help them with their law cases. 2 Product Liability 5But the linguist, trade on familiarity of discourse analysis, semantics, and pragmatics, can determine the extent to which the gist was clear and unambiguous and point out the possible meanings that the message pre sents. formerly this is done, it is up to the attorney to determine whether or not to ask the linguist to testify at trial. 3 Speaker Identification Linguists have been used by attorneys in matters of voice identification.If the tapes are of sufficient quality, spectographic analysis is possible. If not, the linguist may rely on training and skills in phonetics to make the comparison. 4 Authorship of Written Documents Law enforcement agencies process provide a psychological profile of the person. Calling on knowledge of language indicators of such things as regional and social dialect, age, gender, education, and occupation, linguists analyze documents for broad clues to the identity of the writer. Stylistic analysis centers on a writers habitual language features over which the writer has little or no conscious awareness.5 brutal Cases Suspects are recorded with court authorized wire taps position that none of the utterers is aware of being taped, or by using frame microphones and engage suspects in conversation. If the law enforcement agency is concerned about the adequacy of the language evidence that they have gathered, they may call on a linguist to make transcripts of the conversations, analyze them. The tape recorded conversation itself points to the use of the other tools of the forensic linguist, including syntax, morphology, semantics, pragmatics, dialectology, and discourse analysis. 3. Discourse analysis (17)Discourse analysis is concerned with the contexts in and the processes through which we use oral and written language to specific audiences, for specific purposes, in specific settings. 1 What Is Discourse? A Preliminary Characterization The big D concerns general ways of cover the world and general ways of behaving, the small d concerns actual, specific language use.Discourse analysis emphasizes that language is not merely a equanimous system of symbols but a mode of doing, being, and becoming. Discourse research can be divided into 2 m ajor types of inquiries (1) why some but not other linguistic forms are used on  tending(p) occasions and (2) what are the linguistic resources for accomplishing various social, affective, and cognitive actions and interactions.2 communicative Motivations for the Selection of Linguistic Forms Language is inseparable from other aspects of our life and that the endurance of linguistic forms should be explained in terms of authencetic world communicative needs (i. e. , social, interactional, cognitive, affective needs). 2. 1 Context 6One of the first questions is what is happening in this stretch of talk, who the participants are, where they are, and why they are there.Linguistic choices are systematically cause by contextual factors. Context is a complex of 3 dimensions First, the field of social action in which the discourse is embedded. Second, the set of role relations among the participants. And third, the role of language in the interaction. In this facet, language i s a system of choices made on the basis of a contextual configuration which flyers for field, tenor, and mode. 2. 3 delivery act What kind of speech act utterance is and whether this act is accomplished through direct or indirect means. Speech act theory takes that language is used not solo to exposit things but to do things as well.Further, utterances act on 3 different levels the erratum level (locutionary act), the implied level (illocutionary act), and the consequence of the implied act (perlocutionary act). 2. 4 Scripts / plans Script is to describe the knowledge that we have of the structure of stereotypical event sequences. If such knowledge can be described in a formal way, then we may have a theory of how humans process indispensable language. 2. 5 Referentiality How entities () are referred to in utterances. Some analysts are interested in how referential forms make a stretch of discourse cohesive in form and coherent in meaning.2. 6 Topicality and thematicity What is an utterance about, what is the starting point of a message, what is the focus of a message. Topic the part of the utterance about which something is give tongue to. Prague School linguists developed the functional sentence perspective which says that word order has to do with how informative each element in the utterance is communicative dynamism, or CD. A sentence begins with elements with the lowest CD and ends with those with the highest CD. Theme is the part of the utterance with the lowest degree of CD. 2. 7 Sequential organization The resultant context of the utterance.Discourse analysts have sought to explain linguistic choices in terms of ethnographic contexts, knowledge structure, rhetorical organization, communicative intentions, textual organization, information management and sequential organization, among others. Discourse Analysis, Linguistics, and More Discourse analysts research various aspects of language not as an end in itself, but as a means to explore wa ys in which language forms are shaped by and shape the contexts of their use.Further, discourse analysis draws upon not only linguistics, but also anthropology, sociology, psychology, philosophy, cognitive science, and other disciplines in the humanities and social sciences concerned with human communication.Discourse analysis promotes a view of language which says that 7 Resource Center Saved Recents Uploads My Answers Account Products Home Essays crusade Answers Texty About Company Legal Site Map Contact Us Advertise 2016 StudyMode. com HOME > ESSAYS > LINGUISTICS > LINGUISTICS Linguistics Applied linguistics, Discourse analysis, Language By maor87 Apr 17, 2015 6489Words 150 gets More info PDF View Text View PAGE8 OF 18 language use is not only reflective of other aspects of our lives but is also constitutive of them.As it draws insights from various disciplines, it also contributes to interfacing linguistics with other domains of inquiries, such that we mi ght now investigate the construction of culture through conversation or program computers to generate interactive texts based on our understanding of the rules and principles of human interaction. It focusses on language as it is used by real people with real intentions, emotions. 4. Linguistics and pragmatics (16) The Puzzle of Language Use How Do We Ever Understand Each Other? Pragmatics is the study of communication the study of how language is used.This study is based on the surmisal of a division between knowledge of language and the way it is used and the goal of pragmatics is providing a set of principles which dictate how knowledge of language and general reasoning interact in the process of language understanding, to give upgrade to different kinds of make which can be achieved in communication. Pragmatics as the covering of Conversational Principles to Sentence Meanings The starting point for studies in pragmatics is the mismatch between what quarrel mean, and what s peakers mean by using them.There is the knowledge of language, which dictates the meanings of words and the ways in which they can combine. This is called the encoded meaning. On the other hand, there are pragmatic principles which enable a hearer to establish some different interpretation the nonencoded part of meaning. Moreover, given the full array of rhetorical effects such as metaphor, irony, etc. , all of which are uses of discourseions in context in some sense, the proposed approach maintains a natural separation between literal uses of words, which are reflected in sentence-meanings, and the various non-literal uses to which they may be put. fellowship of language sentence-meanings as partial judicial admissions of interpretation The problem for this clean view is that we use commonsense reasoning, whatever this consists in, not merely in functional out why a speaker has said something, but also in establishing what she has said in using the words chosen. The overall turn in of interpretation is that grammar-internal principles articulate both syntactic and semantic structure for sentences, a semantic structure for a sentence being an incomplete specification of how it is understood.Pragmatic theory explains how such incomplete specifications are enriched in context to yield the full communicative effect of an uttered sentence, whether metaphorical, ironical, and so on. The change of Reasoning How Do Hearers ever Manage to Choose the Right interlingual rendition?Grices cooperative principle and the informal maxims According to Grice who was the pioneer of the illative approach to conversation, there is a general assumption underpinning all utterance interpretation that the interpretation of utterances is a collaborative enterprise. This 8collaborative enterprise is structured by a number of maxims, which speakers are presumed to obey The maxim of quality do not say that for which you lack evidence do not say what you believe to be fal se. The maxim of relevance be applicable. The maxim of amount make your contribution as informative as is required, but not more so. The maxim of manner be perspicuous (avoid obscurity, avoid ambiguity, be brief, be orderly).Grice articulated the maxims as a means of simplifying the overall account of the relation between the use of language in logical arguments and the conversational use of language. Relevance theory This theory claims to characterize pragmatic phenomena in terms of a single cognitive concept, that of relevance, replacing the social underpinnings of Grices cooperative principle.The principle of relevance Optimal relevance is getting the obligation balance between size and type of context and amount of information derived. The more information some stimulus yields, the more relevant it is said to become, but the more effort the interpretation of that stimulus requires, the less relevant it will become. And to be minimally relevant a stimulus must lead to a t least one non-trivial inference being derived. However interpretation of an act of communication involves two agents the speaker and the hearer.The constraint of balancing cognitive effect with cognitive effort will also apply to what the hearer does, but here the task of interpretation is more specific because the hearer has to try and recover what the speaker intended to convey. There are two aspects to the task 1 Decoding the information associated with an uttered face i. e. working out what words have been said and the information that they by definition carry. 2 Making choices which enrich that encoded information to establish what the speaker had intended to convey using those words.Relevance and speech acts On the speech act view of language, language can best be understood in terms of acts such as these which speakers carry out in using language. The observation by speech act theorists that there is more to language than just describing things is quite uncontent ious. Nonetheless, in relevance theory, where the type of implications that can be drawn is quite unrestricted, there is no need of any special discrete categories for such different kinds of act. 5. Linguistic typology and its directions (14)1 The motley of Human Languages The field of linguistic typology explores the diversity of human language in an effort to understand it. The staple fiber principle behind typology is that one must look at as wide a range of languages as possible in order to grasp both the diversity of 9language and to discover its limits. Typology uses a fundamentally empirical, comparative, and inductive method in the study of language.That is, typologists examine grammatic data from a wide variety of languages, and infer generalizations about language from that data. The basic discovery of typology is that there are limits to linguistic diversity. By comparing diverse languages and discovering comprehensive grammatical patterns, one can attempt to dise ntangle what is universal about the grammars languages from what is peculiar to each individual language.2 The Nature of Language Universals Word Order One of the first areas of grammar where it was recognise that there are limits to grammatical diversity was the order of words. Word order is probably the most immediately salient difference in grammatical patterns from one language to the next. First, one must examine a sampling of languages in order to infer the range of grammatical diversity and its limits. A variety sample collects as broad a range of languages as possible from different geographical areas and different genetic groupings.Its purpose is to realize that all possible language types are identified. Second, one must be able to identify phenomena from one language to the next as comparable. The basic problem here is the great variety of grammatical structures used in the worlds languages. The solution to this problem is due to other insight of structuralism the basic unit of the language is the sign, a form that conventionally expresses or encodes a meaning. The basis for cross-linguistic comparison is a particular linguistic meaning once that is identified, we may examine the different structures used to encode that meaning.Third, we must identify a range of grammatical patterns or types used to express the linguistic meaning being examined, and classify languages fit in to what type(s) is / are used in them. For instance, in describing word order of the sentence, the relative position of subject (S), object (O), and verb (V) are used to classify language types. Language structure is determined by factors of language use, such as processing. Language structure is also determined by historical relationships among grammatical patterns, which themselves are due to similarity in meaning.However, these factors do not unambiguously determine a language structure, but compete with each other. Speech communities resolve the competing d emands in arbitrary, language-particular ways this leads to the diversity of languages found in the world. 3 Language Universals and the Formal Encoding of Meaning Word order universals attend to be propel in terms of processing of linguistic structure in the act of producing and comprehending language. Word order is a fundamental grammatical property of sentences.3. 1 Typological pronouncedness and morphological representation 10Some of the earliest work in typology examined the coding of grammatical and lexical concepts in inflected word forms. The universals go under the name of (typological) markedness.Typological markedness represents an asymmetric pattern of the demonstration of meaning in grammatical categories across languages. Typological markedness has two central characteristics. First, typological markedness is a property of abstract categories e. g. bizarre and plural form or more precisely, how those conceptual categories are explicit in languages. For num ber, the bizarre is unmarked and the plural is marked. Second, unmarked status does not imply that the unmarked phallus is always leftunexpressed and the marked member is always expressed by an overt morpheme. The presence / absence of an overt inflexion encoding a conceptual category is only one symptom of markedness, namely structural coding. Typological markedness is found in another aspect of the coding of concepts in words and constructions. Most words in sentences express more than one conceptual category. Pronouns in English, for instance, can express gender as well as number. In English, neither the singular nor plural pronouns express number by a separate inflection instead number is implicitly expressed by distinct forms such as he and they.The grammatical coding of additional, cross-cutting, distinctions in the singular but not in the plural is an example of the second symptom of markedness, called behavioral potential. Behavioral potential is also represented by an implicational universal If the marked member of a category grammatically expresses a crosscutting distinction, so does the unmarked member. A third property of typological markedness points to its underlying rendering. The unmarked member is more frequent than the marked member in language use. Concepts that occur more frequently in language use (e. g.singular) will tend to be expressed by fewer morphemes than less frequently occurring concepts (e. g. plural). This explanation for how meaning is encoded in grammatical form is a processing explanation, called prudence or economic motive.3. 2 Hierarchies and conceptual spaces We can describe the cross-linguistic distribution of plural scrapes across classes of pronouns and nouns with the animacy hierarchy. The hierarchy is a succinct way to capture a chain of implicational universals if any class of words has a plural, then all the classes to the left (or higher) on the hierarchy have a plural. These patterns are defined ov er a conceptual space.The conceptual space describes a network of relationships among conceptual categories which exist in the human mind and which constrains how conceptual categories are expressed in grammar. Grammatical change must follow the links in conceptual space. For instance, a plural fool spreads from left to right in the animacy space. Conceptual spaces specify what grammatical category groupings are found in, and how constructions spread (or retreat) over time in their application to grammatical categories.If we compare absence vs. presence of case marking on nouns for the grammatical 11 relations hierarchy, we find that absence of case marking occurs at he higher end of the hierarchy, and presence thence at the lower end of the hierarchy. The grammatical relations hierarchy also defines the distribution of verb agreement across languages.Verb agreement is associated with the higher end of the grammatical relations hierarchy the ability to trigger verb agreement i ndicates the greater behavioral potential of the grammatical relation. These facts demonstrate that the two grammatical relations hierarchies in fact reflect a deeper cross-linguistic universal pattern, found in many different parts ofthe grammar of languages. 3. 3 Economy and iconicity Economic motivation the more frequently used category is more likely to be reduced in expression or left unexpressed. Iconic motivation the structure of language reflects the structure of concepts. In the example, each conceptual category, both singular and plural, are overtly encoded in the word form. A subtype of iconicity called isomorphism the correspondence between forms and meanings. There are two ways in which isomorphism occur in human languages. The first way is in the correspondence of forms and meanings in the combination of words and inflections in a sentence.This is called syntagmatic isomorphism. Economic and iconic motivation compete to produce the range of demonstrate and unatteste d correspondences between form and meaning. There are 3 predicted patterns. Overt expression is iconically motivated there is a one-to-one correspondence between meanings and forms. However, it is only moderately sparingly motivated it is more economical than expressing a meaning with more than one word or morpheme, but less economical than not expressing the meaning at all. Non-expression of a particular meaning, such as the singular of English nouns like car-O (vs.plural book-s), is economically motivated zero expression breaks one-to-one correspondence between forms and meanings.The third possible option, zero marking of both singular and plural, corresponds to the absence of expression of the category. This option is economically motivated either the meaning can be inferred from context, or it is not relevant to the communication. There is another economically motivated pattern of expressing meaning in form the combination or fusion of discrete meanings in a single form. For ex ample, the suffix -s in English run-s indicates 3rd person subject, singular subject and present tense, all in a single suffix. In other languages, inflectional categories are found in separate suffixes, as in Turkish.The second type of isomorphism is the correspondence between form and meaning in the inventory of words stored in the mind paradigmatic isomorphism. 12The possible means of expression of meanings in words are extra by economy and iconicity. Unmotivated possibility the existence of more than one word with the same meaning, synonymy. It is not iconically motivated. A one-to-one match between a word and a meaning is called monosemy. It isiconic ally motivated but not that economically motivated we would need very many words to express each discrete meaning.Homonymy is economically motivated, but it is not iconically motivated (many unrelated meanings are expressed by a single form). By far the most common state of affairs in languages, however, is lexical ambiguity the grouping of related meanings under a single form. Polysemy is economically motivated because it subsumes several meanings under a single form, as with homonymy. It is iconically motivated, because the meanings are related. 4 The Dynamic Approach to Language Universals The most common word.