Tania Salem (1999) clarifies this issue even further, explaining that physician-assisted suicide and voluntary sprightly euthanasia are viewed as "paradigmatic expressions of patients' autonomy" and that they are touted as being "ultimate brakes on the mad use of medical technology at the end of life," in that they promote the "demedicalization" of death. Salem goes on to state, however:
As Salem contends, the somebody's autonomy is not competent justification for complicity to violate the purpose of medicine. If murder is wrong, then it is just as wrong to murder a willing repress as an unwilling one.
Attempts to blur the line between the ethical and the unethical uses of medicine always seem to pivot upon face-to-face choice, as though personal choice should be allowed to fritter away precedence over moral and ethical values. Salem (1999) decries "the printing press that various(prenominal)s be radically free to exercise their singularities and idiosyncrasies." This view runs riposte to prevailing popular thought in our society, which elevates the will of the individual above every other consideration, yet its truth cannot be ignored.
Salem, T. (1999). Physician-Assisted Suicide. The Hastings Center Report, 29, 1. Retrieved on May 24, 2005, at: hypertext transfer protocol://www.questia.com/PM.qst?action=readCheckedResults&rl=1
We are a society that honors the will of the individual to pursue life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We cannot allow those pursuits to displace ethi
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment