English Coursework

pret terminate before you ink. I read the member with an open headway so as not to judge. Clearly you did not birth the kindred sentiment. Wi trim down the subtitle you decided to slate stains, and a variety of celebrities with them. I was amazed that you said doesnt throw away it classy,attractive or wise since it was a very(prenominal) strong and unfounded opinion. I was equ whollyy appalled by the uncivilized and negative language towards these populate, the involvements that were said ab by(p) them were super offensive.I dont value its stamp down for the article to contain such a negative locating oddly to these celebrities who founder achieved great things. An opinion is one thing, plainly judgment is another. for the first time when you mention tattoos as remains graffiti its like you associate it as unlawful vandalism-let makes the reader feel as though they atomic number 18 execute an illegal or public act of crime when they get a tattoo,whereas they ar expressing themselves through a form of art. However, when you mention it as a form of art its very hypocritical, contrasting when it isnt derogatory. Graffiti is usually expound as vandalism art, which generally is all the same. This is stating that you specify that all tattoos and body art be all the same and is a crime. Your opinion is absurd and shows your lack of knowledge about tattoos. Your extremely sexist towards women. You slate in the main females for example Amy Whininess, Victoria Beckman, bloody shame and Angelina Coli etc. You cast criticized each and every(prenominal) one of these females for either their tattoos or their image.This can be proven in the subtitle when it says among celebrities such as Angelina Coli and Amy Whininess These are both females, which is presenting tattoo hypothesise its only females that have tacky tattoos and a poor image. why not include equal amounts of males to females? Why just insult females in which are clearly successf ul for a reason? It seems like your jealous of their fame, so are testifying to downgrade them at your advantage. When you say beautiful women has been anything but blighted it seems as though its your attitude of class judgment.Its an disused forge attitude, showing how narrow minded you are. The word blighted is referring to disease, which is rude,offensive, and a lexical choice. TTS a sexist response, judging women by their looks. let makes women feel hazardous and negative about themselves. They can be extremely sensitive and pull in things personally which can ca wasting disease many an(prenominal) issues and problems with confidence, self esteem and so on . This could of been prevented by your attitude in your articleelf you wouldnt of been so negative towards females and tattoos many problems wouldnt be apparent.You marks a judgment that you mobilise that tattoos are cheap plumage of the attention seeker meaning that you think they are tacky, and brightly colored o mak e them more manifest to others and to draw attention to themselves. You also state that pack with tattoos are dread(a) to be noticed on which is shown when it says last-chance barflies and shoot for as the word aspiring is referring to an ambition be another person in which in this shimmy is by having a tattoo. That is totally an incorrect statement, hence not everyone with a tattoo has an incentive or desire to be on TV, and hatful dont aspire to aim to be on TV.Your clearly stereotyping celebrities, devising them out to be attention seekers without talent. As many people know the judge of anorexia is increasing and more patients are being diagnosed with contrary forms of anorexia. There are many comments about Amy Whininesss body which entrust cause offence among many people but mainly anorexia sufferers. It says the ugly marks that covered her penurious body. Firstly the comment about her tattoo being ugly is very inconsiderate, but the irrelevant and trivial commen t was calling her body signifiedless, since its stating she looks malnourished and abnormally thin.People dont realism how offensive it is to call someone thin ND they think aims only rude to call someone fat. They are both opposites and are very disrespectful to people. Some people have extremely high metabolisms and cant help being extremely thin, so making them feel ashamed of something they cant help is wrong. Also on the other advance anorexia is a mental illness which is something that they couldnt help. Slating someone whom might have this illness is the wrong thing to do and most likely make things worse. Did you take any of the public into consideration? What are they going to think when they read this, and how this may effect hem?Offending and criticizing Amy Whininess because of her weaknesses and problems is insensitive. Rape is a very sensitive topic, which many people are victims of rape. It is wrong to use rape in the wrong context, as people dont understand the c ruelness of sexual violence. The reason its so wrong is because it causes either flashbacks of rape or brings back memories of rape or people they know who have been raped. No one should ever have to go through rape and when they try to forget about it so they can carry on invigoration life it shouldnt be brought back up into their minds.Joking and using rape out of context shows how oblivious you are of the effect rape has on people and how immature your thought can be to be so blockheaded to use that to describe something you dont agree with. This can make people unquiet about rape- thinking they can be raped by a needle which clearly isnt the case, and that the action taken to get a tattoo is life changing and very violent. Using violent vocabulary to tire people to not getting tattoos isnt the right way to approach it and will only annoy people.You try to joke about tattoos being on hyperactive five-year old which have men let loose with a rainbow pack of sharpies. This is q uite a stupid and immature thing to say. The occurrence you would associate tattoos being like hyperactive five year old as if they have designed and drawn the tattoos shows your dim and negative attitude to them. You don t however, need to assault people with them as if at that place tattoos are badly drawn and not to a high quality. The item you bring religion into the subject of tattoos is unnecessary. Some people are extremely sensitive to things about religion so that was an extremely risky thing to bring up.Comparing tattoos and saying that Victoria Beckman thinks her tattoos are dead spiritual corresponding mellisonant candles and Madonna albums and incorporating religious sarcasm is insensitive. Why compare scented candles with Madonnas albums, that just makes you come across as stupid. Furthermore, why compare or relate any of that with tattoos? What right do you have to say Madonna body a holy war of Hindi Sanskrit, Hebrew Latin and Roman numerals You cant mix religio ns and you cant associate her tattoo with a mix of different tattoos, without you knowing it by fact.This is very old school in the sense that your picking different religions which go against each other. Why pick these religions? Why not others? Its a fundamental misunderstanding of terrible atrocities in score and belittles these tropic events. This makes you seem discourteous and a condemnatory act. Think this article should be removed from media to stop animosity to people affected by rape, anorexia, insecurities etc. In future I dont think there should be articles with such strong negative opinions. The effect these articles have on people is huge.It leaves people with negative attitudes especially those who have suffered with mental health issues and rape. wizard point I didnt include was that Tattoos are also used for hue for breast surgery etc. This can be hurtful to those who have had surgery and a tattoo to correct the issue. This article will end up leaving innocent pe ople feeling bad for having tattoos, and all the other rude and negative remarks. Hope you see the effect of this article in another light. Im sure many people agree with me and I hope something will change from now on.