Elizabeth I: Symbol and Ruler of a Nation

" This portrait of a milkweed besidesterfly is relatively balanced, admitting of her faults yet identifying her accomplishments justly and equitably.

Not the same piece of ass be said of the analysis provided by James Anthony Froude (300), who criminate Elizabeth of poorly "furnishing" or outfitting the "Starved and ragged position seamen" upon whom the defeat of the Armada depended. Elizabeth, Froude (301) argues, had "dislike and contempt" for Protestants, and lacking in consider for the Church of England of which she was the supreme governor. This was a ruler "who recognized no authority in any man except as derived from a source distinct from herself" (Froude, 301). Froude (302-303) accuses Elizabeth of having little concern for those who served her, of macrocosm a liar, of being vulnerable to and solicitous of flattery that was "tawdry," and to a fault convinced of her own wisdom and sagacity.

A twentieth coke Elizabethan scholar, Garrett Mattingly (305) criticized Froude for his treatment of Elizabeth and contends that Elizabeth was invigorated (or at least politically and economically sound) in determining that only great provocation in the form of the direct threat of the Armada would be serve for war with Spain. While much of Mattlingly's (308) discussion focuses on the Armada, he makes note of the fact that in this struggle, any doubts as to Elizabeth's championing of Protestantism. He concludes that she was immensely popular because of the

instrument the smashing: Reformer or Egomaniac?

Lomonosov (31) considers Peter to have had " high-and-mighty designs" with respect to the "dissemination of all kinds of knowledge in his homeland, and also for an increase in the numbers of persons skilled in the high branches of learning, together with artists and craftsmen." This, to the extent that it may be true, suggests that a wise crowned head sought to provide his subjects with the tools that they needed for meaningful fraternity in the modern world. However, if one wishes to consider Peter the Great "gentle" as this analyst does, one must thence consider the strategies that he used for introducing unused learning and new knowledge.

One can also argue that an absolute monarch does not necessarily need to behave graciously at all times and perhaps that graciousness can be difficult for such a person. Shcherbatov (39) pointed out that Peter was adjoin by courtiers who flattered him. More insight into the character of Peter is provided by Shcherbatov (39) who says that "most of those around him did not dare to contradict him with anything, but rather flattered him, praising everything he did, and never resisting his whim, while almost even indulged his passions."

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!